Directed by Gore Verbinski
Starring Johnny Depp, Armie Hammer, William Fichtner, Tom Wilkinson and Barry Pepper
I wrote this review after seeing The Lone Ranger in the cinema. The film disappeared before I got around to posting my review. So I decided to save it for when the film hits home video, which should be in the next few weeks.
Despite the negative reviews, this film is a lot of fun. It looks beautiful, it was shot on film to emanate the look of a classic western and the homages to Buster Keaton and classic westerns demonstrate that the film makers really loved the content that they were working with. Like most people, I was reluctant to see this based on the negative reviews. I don’t care much for the work of Johnny Depp. I think he’s been mining the same characters for close to 20 years. I was expecting more of the same old Johnny Depp shtick, especially after the last couple of Pirates films and a few too many trips to Tim Burtonville. In all honesty, he does pull off the same character that he made his second wave career out of. However, there are more interesting things in the film than Johnny Depp.
So what did I think of The Lone Ranger…. Well, I actually loved it. To me this film encapsulated everything great about classic westerns and adventure films from a time before Batman. This was back when a hero was allowed to have fun and didn’t have to be brooding and dark to distract audiences from how silly it all is. Unfortunately, modern audiences don’t take to heroes without some kind of parental tragedy. This is perhaps why they killed Kirk’s dad in the new Star Trek series and turned James Bond into an orphan in Skyfall. They do throw in a tragic back story for Tonto, this serves the film quite well and pushes the character beyond a one-dimensional sidekick. There is also a tragic element to The Lone Ranger, but they did not dwell on this. There were no grand standing speeches and no emotional breakdowns. This was simply a plot device to cue the spectacular and over the top adventure that worked quite well and never felt excessive. Some have complained about the run time but I barely noticed.
This was a throwback to 1930s serial adventure films with a splash of John Ford thrown in for stylistic purposes. Thee John Ford influences were especially present in the desert scenes filmed in Monument Valley or, what is now known as John Ford country. There was also a heavy dose of Buster Keaton in the final act. To me, this was one of the most loving homages to the era of silent film comedies and afternoon serials since Indiana Jones.
Depp has greater chemistry with Hammer than with Orlando Bloom in the Pirates films. Also the support cast of Barry Pepper, Tom Wilkinson and especially William Fichtner as the villains were fantastic. Comparatively, I think I enjoyed this more on a first viewing than I did the first Pirates film or pretty much anything Depp has done this century. The real standout of the film is Armie Hammer as The Lone Ranger. To begin with, I thought he was going to give us a Brendan Fraser style goofball hero. For a large portion of the film he does, but when he steps up in the second half, he knocks it out of the park.
What set this film apart from other summer films of the last few years, is that it was simply fun to watch. For example, the final act was so ludicrously brilliant, that when the classic Lone Ranger theme music kicks in, the film flows like an old silent film and becomes one of the greatest action set-pieces since the rollicking adventures of Raiders of the Lost Ark.
If this was all they gave us I’d be disappointed. This film has an old western look about it, unlike most films were you can spot the CGI and you can tell they have used digital film. This was shot on 35mm and it looks like a classic western, and therefore has a distinct and timeless feel about it. This is a studio film, make no mistake about that. It is Disney after all. However, the scope of this film, the scenery, the set pieces and the simple fact that they went to the extra effort to shoot on film suggests that despite the criticisms that this film has received Verbinski, Depp and co really do love the western genre.
Despite my love for what they did with this film, I will admit there was a lack of emotional depth, also, thematically it is pretty shallow. However, they were not trying to be deep and meaningful, nor was it posing as a dark and gritty take on a classic like most modern films do. Gritty and dark does not necessarily equate to a better film. If anything, the dark and gritty hero is becoming a cliché. This film was all about the fun of playing cowboys and Indians. There were no pretensions about this film. Watch it for the honest and fun ride that it is. Is it perfect? No it’s not but not every film needs to be a classic. It’s fun and its kind of goofy, I don’t think I would want a Lone Ranger film any other way.